At the time, there were 10 members on the board—seven representing the interests of the Beddors and three representing the Murphys. The company declared dividends each year that were enough for each sibling to make the required annual payments on the stock they purchased from their parents.
But the dividends reportedly stopped in 1997, and the children were unable to make their payments on the promissory notes, according to the lawsuit. Rather than declare their children in default, the older Beddors sought assurances that their vision for the company would be carried out in a consensus manner.
This site uses cookies for tracking purposes.
By continuing to browse our website, you agree to the storing of first- and third-party cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing and communication efforts.
Privacy Policy |
Terms of Use |
Close
Japs-Olson Family in Court Over Ownership
At the time, there were 10 members on the board—seven representing the interests of the Beddors and three representing the Murphys. The company declared dividends each year that were enough for each sibling to make the required annual payments on the stock they purchased from their parents.
But the dividends reportedly stopped in 1997, and the children were unable to make their payments on the promissory notes, according to the lawsuit. Rather than declare their children in default, the older Beddors sought assurances that their vision for the company would be carried out in a consensus manner.