Facebook
Facebook
Twitter
Twitter
LinkedIn
LinkedIn
www.beyerprinting.com<%2Fa>).%20My%20second%20Nashville%20insight%20came%20from%20a%2030-page%20article%20titled%20"Throw%20Away%20BHRs%3A%20Win%20the%20Pricing%20Game"%0D%0A%0D%0Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.piworld.com%2Farticle%2Fmove-over-elvis-dickeson-17652%2F" target="_blank" class="email" data-post-id="5210" type="icon_link">
Email
Email
0 Comments
Comments
This is a lot simpler than working with BHRs, says Dodd. You can change the Cost Accumulation Rate any time circumstances of hours or costs appear to have substantially changed. It's still a backward approach to pricing—marking up costs—but it's a lot simpler.
Maybe it'll satisfy some printers still wedded to marked up costs, but it's still unrealistic, I think. Price must be the value perceived by the customer, constrained by the competition. That's totally unrelated to your internal costs. You agree? I still prefer working with the pragmatic approach to pricing I discussed earlier.
0 Comments
View Comments
- Companies:
- Beyer Printing
- Places:
- Nashville
- Nashville, TN
Related Content
Comments